Mindanao is being left behind says Alvarez
In response to discussions about secession, former House Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez has expressed concerns about the development gap between Mindanao and other regions in the Philippines. Alvarez emphasized that Mindanao has been historically neglected, leading to disparities in infrastructure, economic opportunities, and social services compared to other parts of the country.
Alvarez highlighted the need for government attention and investment to address the longstanding issues faced by Mindanao. He stressed that secession should not be the solution, but rather, efforts should focus on equitable development and empowering Mindanaoans to participate fully in the nation’s progress.
Alvarez’s remarks underscore the complex socio-economic and political dynamics in Mindanao, where issues of autonomy, governance, and development intersect. His stance reflects a call for inclusive nation-building and solidarity, emphasizing the importance of addressing regional disparities to foster unity and progress across the Philippines.
Former Speaker and Davao del Norte 1st District Rep. Pantaleon Alvarez has expressed his understanding of the diverse viewpoints among fellow lawmakers from Mindanao regarding the proposal for secession. While acknowledging their perspectives, Alvarez believes that the secession of Mindanao is a justified response to the exploitation of the region by businesses located in the northern part of the country.
In a statement issued on Tuesday, Alvarez highlighted the various ways in which Mindanao has been left behind, including the alleged low priority given to the region in annual budget allocations. He emphasized that the national government tends to extract resources from Mindanao for its own gain, without adequately reinvesting in the development of the region.
Alvarez, along with his long-time ally former President Rodrigo Duterte, has been advocating for the secession of Mindanao as a form of protest against the policies of the current administration. However, this proposal has faced criticism for its perceived divisiveness, with some sectors expressing skepticism about its feasibility.
“We respect their views; they are also our friends, and they share the same concern for Mindanao. They understand how Mindanao has been left behind. The national government extracts resources from us, profits from them, but gives back very little to Mindanao,” Alvarez stated.
“This is evident in budget appropriations. It’s as if we are the ones being robbed, and now the national government complains when we say, ‘Wait a minute, that’s enough, it’s too much,'” he added.
